Runtime Verification primary sources — 2026-04-30
Project status in this pass
- No canonical standalone whitepaper or litepaper surfaced.
- The clearest current source of truth is the company site, GitHub organization, public publications repo, and the first-party docs/readmes for Kontrol and KEVM.
Primary-source snapshots
1) Official homepage
- URL: https://runtimeverification.com/
- Key excerpt:
- The homepage frames Runtime Verification as “Software Assurance for the AI Age” and says it provides “High-assurance cybersecurity consulting for critical systems.”
- It says the team is “Rooted in formal methods” and works closely with organizations building software “that cannot fail.”
- The visible page also links directly into blockchain-relevant public materials such as audit blog posts and public reports.
2) GitHub organization
- URL: https://github.com/runtimeverification
- Key excerpt:
- The org description says Runtime Verification specializes in formal verification of software systems and aims to provide open-source formal verification and developer tooling.
- It explicitly says the mission is to reduce audit costs and enable “continuous formal verification and testing on each commit.”
- The org highlights active projects including K Framework, Kontrol, Simbolik, KEVM, KWasm, and KMIR.
3) Publications repository
- URL: https://github.com/runtimeverification/publications
- Key excerpt:
- The public repository organizes first-party outputs into consensus-protocol formal verification, infrastructure audit/fuzzing/formal verification, and smart-contract security audit/formal verification.
- Visible entries include Ethereum Gasper, Ethereum Beacon Chain, Algorand, EigenLayer, Morpho, Gnosis Safe, Uniswap, Espresso Systems, Monad, and many other named engagements.
- This repo is the strongest single artifact for understanding the breadth and continuity of Runtime Verification’s blockchain-facing work.
4) Publications README
- URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/runtimeverification/publications/master/README.md
- Key excerpt:
- The README exposes a long categorized index of reports and linked artifacts rather than a thin marketing-only portfolio.
- The category split matters because it shows Runtime Verification spanning protocol verification, infrastructure review, and smart-contract work instead of operating only as an EVM audit shop.
5) Kontrol docs
- URL: https://docs.runtimeverification.com/kontrol
- Key excerpt:
- Kontrol is described as a formal verification tool for EVM smart contracts that integrates with Foundry so developers can use Solidity tests as formal specifications.
- The docs emphasize accessibility for non-specialists, compositional symbolic execution, CI integration, and the KaaS hosted verification surface.
- The page also says Kontrol is built on KEVM, reinforcing that Runtime Verification maintains its own foundational verification stack.
6) Kontrol repository README
- URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/runtimeverification/kontrol/master/README.md
- Key excerpt:
- The README says Kontrol combines KEVM and Foundry to let developers perform formal verification without learning a new language or tool.
- It frames the product as especially useful for teams that already have Foundry test suites and want stronger assurance through symbolic execution.
7) KEVM repository README
- URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/kframework/evm-semantics/master/README.md
- Key excerpt:
- The KEVM repo says it provides a model and formal semantics of the EVM in K.
- The repository structure section shows detailed semantic components such as execution rules, gas, schedules, ABI handling, hashed locations, and symbolic-execution helpers.
- This is strong evidence that Runtime Verification’s public surface includes foundational EVM-verification infrastructure, not just services.
Working conclusion
Runtime Verification is best cataloged as formal-verification security and verification-tooling infrastructure with a particularly deep crypto footprint. The combination of a public reports archive, foundational semantics projects, and developer-facing verification tooling makes it materially broader than a conventional audit firm.