InfinityPools primary sources

Collected: 2026-05-11 UTC

Primary sources reviewed

Notes

  • InfinityPools’ key mechanism is not generic margin trading; it is leverage built from borrowed liquidity ranges that already encode an unwind path.
  • The best comparison hook is that borrowing liquidity gives the trader both financing and a bounded-price exit right, so the system behaves more like a packaged loan-plus-option primitive than a classic lending market.
  • The exponential-maturity design is part of the protocol’s substance, not a cosmetic contract parameter. It determines whether the system fragments across expiries, when rollover flow becomes predictable, and how much timing power traders or MEV searchers get.
  • The rate router is analytically important because it suggests practical market power may sit above the pool layer in a routing/aggregation service, even if the underlying leverage primitive is permissionless.
  • This entry belongs in the active corpus because it helps compare AMM-native leverage designs where the main control surface is liquidity-shape selection and routing rather than post hoc liquidation infrastructure.