Gardens v2 primary sources — 2026-05-09

Classification takeaway

Gardens v2 is most useful as a modular governance-and-funding framework rather than as a single DAO, generic grants site, or simple conviction-voting demo. The key reusable mechanism is that it packages ecosystems, communities, pools, and proposals into a reusable stack where communities can choose different pool types and voting-weight systems while retaining conviction-voting style time accumulation for support. The main control surfaces are pool design, threshold parameters, and dependency choices around custody, indexing, and streaming.

Primary sources reviewed

1. Official docs intro — https://docs.gardens.fund/

   • Best first-party framing of Gardens as a bottom-up governance framework for web3 ecosystems.
   • States the initial focus on Conviction Voting, Quadratic Voting, and Streaming Proposals.

2. Conviction 101 — https://docs.gardens.fund/conviction-voting/conviction-101.md

   • Best concise source for the definition of conviction voting inside the product.
   • Shows that support strength grows over time and is meant to favor sustained rather than flash support.

3. Conviction pool types — https://docs.gardens.fund/conviction-voting/conviction-pool-types.md

   • Best source for the distinction between funding, signaling, and streaming-style pools.
   • Important because it makes clear Gardens is a multi-mode governance framework, not only a funding allocator.

4. Conviction parameters — https://docs.gardens.fund/conviction-voting/conviction-parameters.md

   • Best source for where practical authority sits in the mechanism.
   • Documents conviction growth, minimum conviction, spending limit, and fixed minimum threshold.

5. Streaming proposals docs — https://docs.gardens.fund/proposals/streaming-proposals.md

   • Sparse, but useful as evidence that the framework is trying to support continuous funding rather than only one-time grants.

6. Official repository — https://github.com/1Hive/gardens-v2

   • Confirms Gardens v2 is a live open-source software project rather than only a concept site.

7. Repository README — https://raw.githubusercontent.com/1Hive/gardens-v2/main/README.md

   • Best engineering-level summary.
   • Documents modular governance pools, funding/signaling pool types, flexible vote-weight systems, multi-network deployment, and dependencies including Allo Protocol v2, The Graph, and Safe.

Why it stays in the active corpus

• Strong continuation and modularization of the Commons Stack / 1Hive conviction-voting lineage.
• Helpful comparison class for public-goods funding systems that separate signaling, grant allocation, and streaming support inside one governance surface.
• Worth keeping because it makes parameter governance legible: half-life tuning, conviction floors, and spending limits matter as much as nominal token voting.
• Useful reminder that many “protocol” governance systems are really orchestration layers over external custody, indexing, and payout infrastructure.