True Network

  • Name: True Network
  • URL: https://docs.truenetwork.io/
  • Category: onchain reputation protocol / attestation-and-algorithm middleware / issuer-controlled reputation chain / app-retention infrastructure
  • Summary: True Network is best understood not as a generic loyalty-points app, but as a dedicated reputation chain where applications register as issuers, write structured attestations about users, and deploy onchain reputation algorithms as WASM modules. Its core mechanism is the separation of schema/attestation issuance from algorithm design and execution: developers define what facts they want to attest, then separately deploy scoring logic that turns those attestations into application-specific reputation. That makes True Network a useful comparison class for Orange Protocol, OpenRank, Talent Protocol, and other reputation systems: instead of one global score or one credential registry, it offers a chain-level developer platform for app-owned reputation models, where the real control surface sits in issuer admission, schema design, and algorithm deployment.
  • What it does:
    • Lets applications create structured schemas and issue immutable onchain attestations to user wallets
    • Supports cross-ecosystem subject addresses in examples and docs, including EVM, Solana, and Polkadot addresses
    • Exposes a reputation-computation layer where developers deploy algorithms written in TypeScript / AssemblyScript and compiled to WASM modules that run on network nodes
    • Frames itself as infrastructure for identifying, rewarding, and retaining power users in games, DeFi, and social applications
    • Ships developer tooling including a TypeScript SDK, CLI, browser playground, explorer surfaces, and example repositories
    • Organizes the early Raman testnet around explicit protocol components for issuer registration, credentials/attestations, and algorithms
  • Key claims:
    • True Network’s most analytically useful primitive is not “reputation” in the abstract but a split stack: issuers define schemas and write attestations, while separately deployed algorithms decide how those attestations become scores or rewards. That makes the algorithm layer a first-class governance surface instead of hiding it behind a black-box score.
    • The protocol lightpaper makes its intended wedge unusually explicit: dApps use reputation to identify and retain power users. So the core comparison is not only with identity systems, but with retention infrastructure, loyalty systems, and reward-routing middleware.
    • The Raman tooling docs reveal that the chain is being built around three explicit pallets — Issuer, Credential, and Algorithm. That decomposition matters because it shows where power can concentrate: who is allowed to register as issuer, who defines the attestable schema, and who controls deployed algorithms.
    • The attestation docs treat structured schema creation as the normal entrypoint. That means True Network is less like a one-off badge issuer and more like a programmable reputation database whose downstream meaning depends on application-specific logic.
    • The example repository is especially useful because it shows the intended developer experience: attestations are issued from a web2-like SDK/CLI environment, then algorithm code is compiled and deployed separately. In practice, that creates a distinct control plane around developer tooling, algorithm packaging, and network deployment permissions.
    • True Network differs from Orange Protocol in emphasis: Orange foregrounds data-provider / model-provider separation and portable proof export, while True foregrounds issuer-controlled attestations plus onchain algorithm deployment. It differs from OpenRank because the latter centers ranking over graph-like data, whereas True centers application-owned attestations and scoring logic.
    • True Network belongs in the active corpus because it sharpens a useful mechanism class: a dedicated reputation chain where “who can attest” and “who can deploy the scoring function” matter more than any single nominal reputation score.
  • Whitepaper: No standalone canonical whitepaper PDF surfaced in this pass. The strongest primary materials were the official protocol lightpaper overview, attestation docs, tooling docs, and official GitHub surfaces. See ../whitepapers/true-network-primary-sources-2026-05-10.md.
  • Sources:
  • Last reviewed: 2026-05-10 UTC